Rationality, Intuition, and Behavioral Biases in Investment Decisions: Bridging Classical Finance and Behavioral Finance with Evidence from Morocco

Raja El Asri () and Abdelaziz Messaoudi
Additional contact information
Raja El Asri: FSJES Agadir, Université Ibn Zohr = Ibn Zohr University [Agadir]
Abdelaziz Messaoudi: FSJES Agadir, Université Ibn Zohr = Ibn Zohr University [Agadir]

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Financial decision-making has conventionally been conceptualized within the classical framework of rational agents functioning in efficient markets. This theoretical construct, represented by Homo economicus, posits that individuals possess complete information, demonstrate consistent behavior, and are solely dedicated to optimizing expected utility. Nevertheless, enduring market anomalies such as bubbles, excessive volatility, and momentum phenomena have called into question this rationalist perspective. These discrepancies underscore that investors frequently operate under the influence of psychological and social determinants rather than pure rationality. Behavioral finance has emerged as a discipline to bridge the existing gaps by synthesizing perspectives from psychology and sociology. It elucidates how cognitive biases, emotional responses, and heuristics such as overconfidence, loss aversion, and herding behavior consistently influence investment decisions. Prospect Theory, for example, illustrates that investors assess gains and losses asymmetrically, frequently resulting in suboptimal decision-making. Contemporary frameworks, such as Andrew Lo's Adaptive Market Hypothesis, endeavor to reconcile classical and behavioral paradigms by conceptualizing markets as evolutionary systems in which rationality evolves in response to shifting environmental conditions. Evidence from emerging economies, such as Morocco, substantiates these observations. Research indicates that investors in Morocco demonstrate analogous behavioral characteristics, particularly overconfidence, herding behavior, and loss aversion that markedly affect their investment results. Integrating classical finance theories with behavioral finance principles facilitates a more nuanced comprehension of financial behavior. Acknowledging both rational analytical frameworks and psychological inclinations enhances the development of superior financial models, more effective policy formulation, and refined decision-making strategies for both investors and managers.

Keywords: Cognitive Biases; Efficient Market Hypothesis; Prospect Theory; Investment Decisions; Morocco; Intuition; Behavioral Finance; Rationality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-12-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-upt
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05691219v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in International journal of applied management and economics, 2025, 02 (17 (2025)), pp.167-187. ⟨10.5281/zenodo.17801304⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-05691219v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05691219

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17801304

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().