The good, the bad and the ugly of comparative ethnographies: a junior ethnographer's autoethnography

Hussein Nasser ()
Additional contact information
Hussein Nasser: EM - EMLyon Business School

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Purpose: To examine what comparative ethnography does to method, ethics and researcher identity when undertaken by a junior scholar navigating multilingual, multi-site fieldwork and to propose transferable tactics for managing immersion, analysis and ethics in comparative designs. Design/methodology/approach: Analytic autoethnography drawing on several years of simultaneous participant observation across two French migration-support associations, organised through a triadic heuristic that categorises experiential insights into generative opportunities, logistical and emotional burdens and ethical conundrums. Findings: Comparative ethnography yields unique analytical leverage (e.g. generative data breadth, comparative insight and personal growth) but introduces significant logistical, emotional and ethical costs, including questioned commitment, cognitive overload, inter-site leakage and observer-participant entanglement. These burdens fall disproportionately on junior and multilingual researchers navigating complex positionalities. Research limitations/implications: The study implies that methodological training for ethnographers should attend more seriously to the compounded demands of comparative designs, particularly for early-career scholars. Practical implications: Offers implementable tactics for junior ethnographers to maximise the generative opportunities of comparative fieldwork while managing its logistical, cognitive and ethical demands across simultaneous field sites.Social implications Contributes to broader conversations about early-career researcher precarity in qualitative social science, and about the conditions under which rigorous ethnographic research can be conducted responsibly. Originality/value: One of the first junior-scholar autoethnographies to theorise how comparative ethnography reconfigures method, ethics and researcher identity in practice, grounded in deep, simultaneous engagement across two closely matched organisational sites.

Keywords: Autoethnography; Comparative ethnography; Migration studies; Qualitative methods (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-07-06
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Journal of Organizational Ethnography, inPress, pp.21. ⟨10.1108/JOE-08-2025-0108⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05708336

DOI: 10.1108/JOE-08-2025-0108

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().