Assessing the impact of agricultural market participation on banking access and savings: evidence from Ghana

Anicet Kabré () and Arouna Kouandou ()
Additional contact information
Anicet Kabré: EconomiX - EconomiX - UPN - Université Paris Nanterre - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, LEFMI - Laboratoire d’Économie, Finance, Management et Innovation - UR UPJV 4286 - UPJV - Université de Picardie Jules Verne
Arouna Kouandou: LEGO - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Gestion de l'Ouest - UBS - Université de Bretagne Sud - UBO EPE - Université de Brest - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] - IBSHS - Institut Brestois des Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société - UBO EPE - Université de Brest - UBL - Université Bretagne Loire - IMT Atlantique - IMT Atlantique - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris]

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This paper examines the extent to which participation in agricultural markets has long-term effects on rural household livelihoods. While most related studies have focused on the impact on illiquid assets such as consumer durables and livestock owned by rural households, this study focuses on access to basic banking and savings devices at both the extensive and intensive margins. Drawn on the sixth and seventh waves of the Ghana Living Standard Survey and using an instrumental variables approach, the econometric analysis provides results suggesting that rural households that commercialize maize are about 8.6%, 9%, and 19% more likely to be members of savings and loan schemes, cooperative or credit unions, and Rotating Savings and Credit Associations, respectively. At the intensive margin, we find that maize commercialization is associated with a 53% and 41% increase in the amount saved and the balance of savings, respectively. Governments and international development partners in sub-Saharan Africa have devoted considerable resources to help smallholder farmers shift from subsistence farming to market-oriented agriculture as a key means of lifting rural households out of poverty. As access to liquidity acts more effectively as a buffer and mitigates the negative welfare effects of unforeseen adverse shocks, our findings are consistent with this agenda.

Keywords: Agricultural market participation; Rural finance; Rural livelihood (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-08-25
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, 2026, ⟨10.1007/s41130-026-00265-4⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05732879

DOI: 10.1007/s41130-026-00265-4

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().