Climate Change Finance and Carbon Offsets: Addressing Global Climate Challenges through Innovative Funding and Emissions Reduction Mechanisms

Monday Adiaha ()
Additional contact information
Monday Adiaha: Scientific Department, Institute of Biopaleogeography named under Charles R. Darwin, Zlocieniec,

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The global climate finance landscape remains insufficient to meet Paris Agreement targets, with unclear contributions from public, private, and voluntary carbon market flows. This study analyzed the structure and sufficiency of global climate finance flows against those targets using secondary quantitative data from key repositories (CPI, MDB Climate Finance Reports, BNEF, Ecosystem Marketplace), assessed for additionality, concessionally, and Paris alignment. Total tracked climate finance flows for 2019 were approximately $579 billion, comprising $253 billion from public sources and $326 billion from private investment in renewable energy. A detailed breakdown reveals foundational but insufficient public finance: Multilateral Development Bank (MDB) climate finance totalled $61.6 billion, with 67% directed to low-and middle-income countries. Private investment was concentrated in renewable energy, with combined global wind and solar investment reaching $269 billion in 2019. The analysis identifies the Voluntary Carbon Market (VCM) as a potential bridging mechanism, though one facing severe contraction and integrity challenges. Transaction volume exceeded 100 MtCO₂e in 2020, dominated by forestry projects (52%). However, by 2023 the market value had contracted sharply to $723 million, with a 56% yearon-year volume decline, signalling buyer hesitancy due to pervasive limitations. These include uncertainty regarding additionality, permanence risk, systemic over-crediting (with a significant share of credits failing new integrity benchmarks), and insufficient equity and data governance. The study concludes that while scaling proven mechanisms like green bonds is necessary, it is insufficient alone. Aligning financial flows with climate imperatives requires coupling this scale with rigorous reforms to carbon offset verification, strengthened market governance, and more transparent reporting to address critical integrity and data quality gaps.

Keywords: Climate Finance; Carbon Offsets; Carbon Market; Green Bonds; Public Finance; Climate Finance Carbon Offsets Carbon Market Green Bonds Public Finance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-09-07
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05741625v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Journal of the University of Ruhuna , 2026, 14, pp.48 - 64. ⟨10.4038/jur.v14i1.8094⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-05741625v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05741625

DOI: 10.4038/jur.v14i1.8094

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().