Getting Published in, and Reviewing for, Group & Organization Management

Yannick Griep, William Billy Obenauer, Kevin S. Cruz, Walter Davis, Paul Harvey, Jonatahn Pinto, Tammy Rapp, Devaki Rau, Moran Anisman-Razin, Andrew Bennett, Neva Bojovic, Layla Branicki, Turanay Caner, Rich Dejordy, Emilija Djurdjevic, Achiel Fenneman, Jesse Fennman, Amanda Ferguson, Roberta Fida, Kayla Follmer, Marion Fortin (), Yvonne Garbers, Patrick Garcia, Mark Geiger, Peter Gianodis and Al And
Additional contact information
Yannick Griep: Unknown
William Billy Obenauer: Unknown
Kevin S. Cruz: Unknown
Walter Davis: Unknown
Paul Harvey: Unknown
Jonatahn Pinto: Unknown
Tammy Rapp: Unknown
Devaki Rau: Unknown
Moran Anisman-Razin: Unknown
Andrew Bennett: Unknown
Neva Bojovic: Unknown
Layla Branicki: Unknown
Turanay Caner: Unknown
Rich Dejordy: Unknown
Emilija Djurdjevic: Unknown
Achiel Fenneman: Unknown
Jesse Fennman: Unknown
Amanda Ferguson: Unknown
Roberta Fida: Unknown
Kayla Follmer: Unknown
Marion Fortin: TSM - Toulouse School of Management Research - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - TSM - Toulouse School of Management - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse
Yvonne Garbers: Unknown
Patrick Garcia: Unknown
Mark Geiger: Unknown
Peter Gianodis: Unknown
Al And: Unknown

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Every year at the Academy of Management meetings, the editors of Group & Organization Management (GOM) meet with the editorial board and friends of the journal to discuss what we are looking for and, just as importantly, what we are not looking for. Usually, this appears as a single slide. The aim of this editorial is to turn that slide into a detailed, written guide for authors and reviewers. We want to clarify what counts as a strong fit and contribution for GOM, how questionable research practices (QRPs) can creep into reviewing just as much as into authorship, how we see the balance between theory and methods at the journal, and how reviewers can appropriately evaluate the different formats we publish—regular manuscripts, GOMusings, GOM Now, and GOMethods—without applying a one-size-fits-all empirical template to everything. Our hope is that this editorial will be equally useful to authors deciding whether a manuscript belongs at GOM and to reviewers thinking about how to write fair, rigorous, and developmental reviews.

Keywords: Publisher Editorial; Journal Policy; GOM Journal (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-06
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Group and Organization Management, 2026, vol.51 (n°3), pp.1153- 1199. ⟨10.1177/10596011261415739⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05777806

DOI: 10.1177/10596011261415739

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().