Le poids des coauteurs

Marc Deschamps

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This paper presents a critical appraisal of the approach used by the jury of the 2007- 2008 concours d'agrégation en sciences économiques as regards the evaluation of papers written in coauthorship. The agrégation is a centralized academic hiring procedure through which professors of economics are selected in France. We will demonstrate that no natural method exists in this domain. Consequently, we suggest to either abandon the idea that coauthorship has a particular value, or to choose a procedure, upon which the economists' community has agreed by consensus. This critical assessment might also be of interest for the evaluation of papers done in co-authorship by law researchers.

Keywords: coautorship; research evaluation; bibliometric indicators; coauteurs; agrégation; évaluation; indicateurs bibliométriques (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Revue internationale de droit économique, 2009, t. XXIII (4), pp.451-463

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: Le poids des coauteurs (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00766873

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().