EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Turbulence, Firm Decentralization, and Growth in Bad Times

Philippe Aghion (), Nicholas Bloom, Brian Lucking, Raffaella Sadun and John van Reenen
Additional contact information
Philippe Aghion: PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, PJSE - Paris Jourdan Sciences Economiques - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, Collège de France - Chaire Economie des institutions, de l'innovation et de la croissance - CdF (institution) - Collège de France
Brian Lucking: Stanford University

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: What is the optimal form of firm organization during "bad times"? The greater turbulence following macro shocks may benefit decentralized firms because the value of local information increases (the "localist" view). On the other hand, the need to make tough decisions may favor centralized firms (the "centralist" view). Using two large micro datasets on decentralization in firms in ten OECD countries (WMS) and US establishments (MOPS administrative data), we find that firms that delegated more power from the central headquarters to local plant managers prior to the Great Recession outperformed their centralized counterparts in sectors that were hardest hit by the subsequent crisis (as measured by export growth and product durability). Results based on measures of turbulence based on product churn and stock market volatility provide further support to the localist view. This conclusion is robust to alternative explanations such as managerial fears of bankruptcy and changing coordination costs. Although decentralization will be suboptimal in many environments, it does appear to be beneficial for the average firm during bad times.

Date: 2021-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)

Published in American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2021, 13 (1), pp.133-169. ⟨10.1257/app.20180752⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: Turbulence, Firm Decentralization, and Growth in Bad Times (2021) Downloads
Working Paper: Turbulence, firm decentralization and growth in bad times (2021) Downloads
Working Paper: Turbulence, Firm Decentralization, and Growth in Bad Times (2021)
Working Paper: Turbulence, firm decentralization and growth in bad times (2017) Downloads
Working Paper: Turbulence, Firm Decentralization and Growth in Bad Times (2017) Downloads
Working Paper: Turbulence, Firm Decentralization and Growth in Bad Times (2017) Downloads
Working Paper: Turbulence, firm decentralization and growth in bad times (2017) Downloads
Working Paper: Turbulence, Firm Decentralization and Growth in Bad Times (2017) Downloads
Working Paper: Turbulence, Firm Decentralization and Growth in Bad Times (2017) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03166697

DOI: 10.1257/app.20180752

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03166697