Turbulence, Firm Decentralization, and Growth in Bad Times
Philippe Aghion (),
Nicholas Bloom,
Brian Lucking,
Raffaella Sadun and
John van Reenen
Additional contact information
Philippe Aghion: PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, PJSE - Paris Jourdan Sciences Economiques - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École nationale des ponts et chaussées - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, Collège de France - Chaire Economie des institutions, de l'innovation et de la croissance - CdF (institution) - Collège de France
Brian Lucking: Stanford University
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
What is the optimal form of firm organization during "bad times"? The greater turbulence following macro shocks may benefit decentralized firms because the value of local information increases (the "localist" view). On the other hand, the need to make tough decisions may favor centralized firms (the "centralist" view). Using two large micro datasets on decentralization in firms in ten OECD countries (WMS) and US establishments (MOPS administrative data), we find that firms that delegated more power from the central headquarters to local plant managers prior to the Great Recession outperformed their centralized counterparts in sectors that were hardest hit by the subsequent crisis (as measured by export growth and product durability). Results based on measures of turbulence based on product churn and stock market volatility provide further support to the localist view. This conclusion is robust to alternative explanations such as managerial fears of bankruptcy and changing coordination costs. Although decentralization will be suboptimal in many environments, it does appear to be beneficial for the average firm during bad times.
Date: 2021-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)
Published in American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2021, 13 (1), pp.133-169. ⟨10.1257/app.20180752⟩
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
Journal Article: Turbulence, Firm Decentralization, and Growth in Bad Times (2021) 
Working Paper: Turbulence, firm decentralization and growth in bad times (2021) 
Working Paper: Turbulence, Firm Decentralization, and Growth in Bad Times (2021)
Working Paper: Turbulence, firm decentralization and growth in bad times (2017) 
Working Paper: Turbulence, Firm Decentralization and Growth in Bad Times (2017) 
Working Paper: Turbulence, Firm Decentralization and Growth in Bad Times (2017) 
Working Paper: Turbulence, firm decentralization and growth in bad times (2017) 
Working Paper: Turbulence, Firm Decentralization and Growth in Bad Times (2017) 
Working Paper: Turbulence, Firm Decentralization and Growth in Bad Times (2017) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03166697
DOI: 10.1257/app.20180752
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().