John Dewey and John R. Commons: Crossed Perspectives on Ethics, the State and Democracy

Laure Bazzoli () and Véronique Dutraive ()
Additional contact information
Laure Bazzoli: TRIANGLE - Triangle : action, discours, pensée politique et économique - ENS de Lyon - École normale supérieure de Lyon - Université de Lyon - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - IEP Lyon - Sciences Po Lyon - Institut d'études politiques de Lyon - Université de Lyon - UJM - Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne - UJM EPE - Université Jean Monnet (EPSCPE) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Véronique Dutraive: TRIANGLE - Triangle : action, discours, pensée politique et économique - ENS de Lyon - École normale supérieure de Lyon - Université de Lyon - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - IEP Lyon - Sciences Po Lyon - Institut d'études politiques de Lyon - Université de Lyon - UJM - Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne - UJM EPE - Université Jean Monnet (EPSCPE) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This article offers a renewed comparative analysis of John Dewey and John R. Commons−respectively a philosopher and an economist-sociologist−aimed at clarifying the intellectual foundations that pragmatism provides for institutional economics. While the two thinkers evolved in parallel and Commons explicitly drew on Dewey, the depth and structure of their theoretical convergences remain insufficiently explored. Our contribution is to show that both authors share a pragmatist ontology centred on associated action, the transactional nature of social life, and the intrinsic correlation between economic, political, legal, and ethical phenomena. This common ground supports a democratic ethic that informs their respective approaches to social inquiry and social reform. Building on this framework, we provide an original interpretation of how Commons operationalizes Dewey's normative ideal of creative democracy. His theory of reasonable value and his institutional design for economic democracy translate Dewey's ethical commitments into concrete mechanisms for regulating capitalism through collective bargaining, representative interests, and inquiry-based rulemaking. The article concludes by raising a central question for contemporary institutionalism: how compatible are Dewey's radical democratic aspirations with Commons' reformist ideal of a ``reasonable capitalism''?.

Keywords: Economic Philosophy; John Dewey; John R. Commons; Economic Democracy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 2026, Published: 16 February 2026, ⟨10.1007/s40844-026-00334-9⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-05542815

DOI: 10.1007/s40844-026-00334-9

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().