Payment for Environmental Services and environmental tax under imperfect competition
Anneliese Krautkraemer and
Sonia Schwartz
Working Papers from HAL
Abstract:
This paper designs the second-best Payment for Environmental Services (PES) when it interacts with a Pigouvian tax under imperfect competition. We consider farmers who face a choice between producing a conventional or an organic agriculture good. The regulator sets a Pigouvian tax on conventional agriculture as it generates environmental damages, as well as a PES on uncultivated land as buffer strips favor biodiversity. The conventional agriculture sector is perfectly competitive, unlike the organic agriculture sector, which is organized under an oligopoly. We show that the second-best level of the Pigouvian tax is higher than the marginal damage whereas the PES is lower than the marginal benefit. We then introduce the social marginal cost of public funds (MCF) and show that the Pigouvian tax increases with the MCF while the PES decreases with the MCF provided that demand for the conventional agriculture good is inelastic. We thus highlight a contributory component of the environmental incentive tax. This paper also identifies specific cases where the PES is ineffective in promoting biodiversity.
Keywords: Biodiversity Conservation Payement for Environmental Services Pigouvian Tax the Social Marginal Social Cost of Public Funds Market Power; Biodiversity Conservation; Payement for Environmental Services; Pigouvian Tax; the Social Marginal Social Cost of Public Funds; Market Power JEL Codes: Q57 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-07-12
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04160411
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-04160411/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-04160411
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8131454
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().