Forking paths in financial economics

Guillaume Coqueret ()
Additional contact information
Guillaume Coqueret: EM - EMLyon Business School

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: We argue that spanning large numbers of degrees of freedom in empirical analysis allows better characterizations of effects and thus improves the trustworthiness of conclusions. Our ideas are illustrated in three studies: equity premium prediction, asset pricing anomalies and risk premia estimation. In the first, we find that each additional degree of freedom in the protocol expands the average range of t-statistics by at least 30%. In the second, we show that resorting to forking paths instead of bootstrapping in multiple testing raises the bar of significance for anomalies: at the 5% confidence level, the threshold for bootstrapped statistics is 4.5, whereas with paths, it is at least 8.2, a bar much higher than those currently used in the literature. In our third application, we reveal the importance of particular steps in the estimation of premia. In addition, we use paths to corroborate prior findings in the three topics. We document heterogeneity in our ability to replicate prior studies: some conclusions seem robust, others do not align with the paths we were able to generate.

Date: 2023-12-06
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04326533v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-04326533v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-04326533

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().