Prices vs Quantities under Severe Uncertainty

Brian Hill ()
Additional contact information
Brian Hill: GREGH - Groupement de Recherche et d'Etudes en Gestion à HEC - HEC Paris - Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: The consensus among economists in favour of carbon taxes over emissions permits is based on a groundbreaking result due to Weitzman (1974). It assumes, however, a probability distribution over abatement costs, and similarly for damages. As many have argued, current climate uncertainties are far more severe, and do not justify any such distributions. This paper reconsiders the tax-permit comparison in the presence of severe or Knightian uncertainty, drawing on the workhorse maxmin-EU model from the literature on decision under uncertainty (Gilboa and Schmeidler, 1989). Our results show that optimally set permits are strictly more efficient than optimal taxes when uncertainty concerning the slope of marginal abatement costs is severe. They suggest that, given the uncertainty reported in the latest IPCC report, permit policies are more efficient.

Keywords: emissions permits; severe uncertainty; ambiguity; uncertainty vs. risk; robust policy analysis.; Carbon taxes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024-12-28
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://cnrs.hal.science/hal-04857419v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cnrs.hal.science/hal-04857419v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-04857419

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4826405

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().