EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A First Look at the Efficiency-Quality Nexus in Soum Health Centers in Mongolia: Insights from Two Surveys

Jacky Mathonnat, Aurore Pelissier () and Khorolsuren Lkhagvasuren
Additional contact information
Jacky Mathonnat: CERDI - Centre d'Études et de Recherches sur le Développement International - IRD - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UCA - Université Clermont Auvergne, FERDI - Fondation pour les Etudes et Recherches sur le Développement International
Aurore Pelissier: FERDI - Fondation pour les Etudes et Recherches sur le Développement International, LEDi - Laboratoire d'Economie de Dijon [Dijon] - UBE - Université Bourgogne Europe
Khorolsuren Lkhagvasuren: Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: This Working Paper explores whether technical efficiency and quality of care are aligned in Mongolia's Soum Health Centers (SHCs), which are central to rural primary health care and universal health coverage (UHC). Using 2018 data from two studies—one assessing SHC efficiency with DEA (Simar & Wilson double bootstrap), the other measuring service perceived quality with SERVQUAL and potential quality with SARA—the authors analyse 31 SHCs across seven regions (aïmags). Average technical efficiency is 0.73, implying that SHCs could, in principle and in average, maintain current output levels with about 27% fewer inputs, freeing resources for other PHC priorities. Perceived quality, however, is modest (mean SERVQUAL 0.49), and the correlation between efficiency and perceived quality is negative, including for most SERVQUAL dimensions. By contrast, efficiency shows only weak and statistically non-significant associations with SARA-based availability, readiness and a composite "Potential Effective Quality" index. The paper discusses behavioural and institutional mechanisms behind this disconnect, stressing that perceived quality is a major driver of demand, while SARA captures capacity rather than actual quality care. It concludes with policy recommendations aimed at enabling authorities to make informed decisions about aligning efficiency and quality of care: updating and expanding sample and metrics, assessing real healthcare quality in high- and low-efficiency SHCs, explicitly integrating efficiency drivers and contextual factors when analysing quality issues, and systematically feeding back findings to managers, frontline team and central decisionmaking levels.

Keywords: Health centers; Efficiency; Healthcare quality; Mongolia (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-12-22
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05434344v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-05434344v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05434344

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2026-01-13
Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05434344