EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Asset Pricing and Risk Sharing in Complete Markets: An Experimental Investigation

Bruno Biais, Thomas Mariotti (), Sophie Moinas () and Sébastien Pouget ()
Additional contact information
Bruno Biais: HEC Paris - Recherche - Hors Laboratoire - HEC Paris - Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales
Thomas Mariotti: TSE-R - Toulouse School of Economics - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement
Sophie Moinas: Finance - CRM - Centre de Recherche en Management - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse - IAE - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Toulouse - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Sébastien Pouget: TSM - Toulouse School of Management Research - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - TSM - Toulouse School of Management - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse

Working Papers from HAL

Abstract: We study asset pricing and risk sharing in experimental financial markets designed to test rational choice and competitive behavior in complete markets. Participants behave competitively but deviate from rationality: approximately 25% of actions are first-order stochastically dominated. We propose a random-choice model predicting that market-clearing prices and average trades converge to the rational-choice competitive equilibrium as market size grows. Our experimental data support this convergence prediction. Structural estimation with CRRA utilities and logit choice probabilities reveals that approximately 20% of participants would have higher expected utility in autarky, suggesting bounded rationality can make market participation welfare-reducing for a significant minority.

Keywords: Asset Pricing; Risk Sharing; Experimental Financial Markets; Complete Markets; Convergence to Equilibrium; Random-Choice Model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05475576v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-05475576v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05475576

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2026-02-03
Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-05475576