On the Perils of Environmentally Friendly Alternatives

Francisco Alpizar Rodriguez, Fredrik Carlsson and Gracia Lanza ()
Additional contact information
Gracia Lanza: CATIE

No 22-13, EfD Discussion Paper from Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg

Abstract: Environmentally friendly alternatives are touted as a key component of a transition towards lowering the impact of human activity on the environment. The environmental costs of these technologies are seldom null; they are simply less environmentally damaging than existing options. In this paper, we investigate consumer behavior when an environmentally friendly alternative is introduced under different decision contexts. Using a carefully constructed field experimental design, we look at the use of plastic bags vis-a-vis biodegradable (bio) bags, when the latter are offered for free versus at a price. Moreover, we explore offering costly biodegradable bags as part of the default choice. We find that giving away the bio bags for free results in a large behavioral rebound effect, resulting in a large increase in the total number of bags. Setting a small, rather symbolic price offsets this rebound effect completely. Interestingly, when the bio bag is offered as a default, the behavioral rebound remains. The large behavioral rebound effect leads us to conclude against providing these environmentally friendly alternatives for free, and to caution against the use of subsidies to promote their uptake.

Keywords: biodegradable; plastic bags; behavioral; rebound (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C93 D91 Q53 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 26 pages
Date: 2022-06-23
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-env, nep-exp, nep-nud and nep-res
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.efdinitiative.org/sites/default/files/ ... 0Hub%20June%2022.pdf Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: On the perils of environmentally friendly alternatives (2024)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:gunefd:2022_013

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in EfD Discussion Paper from Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Franklin Amuakwa-Mensah ().