The Major Divide: Student Sorting, Meritocratic Admissions & Upward Mobility

Goya Razavi ()
Additional contact information
Goya Razavi: Dept. of Economics, Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, Postal: NHH, Department of Economics, Helleveien 30, N-5045 Bergen, Norway, https://goyarazavi.github.io/

No 10/2026, Discussion Paper Series in Economics from Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics

Abstract: Large earnings gaps by socio-economic status (SES) persist among college applicants even where tuition is free. Using the universe of Danish applications linked to administrative earnings, I ask whether these gaps reflect low returns to selective majors, admission rules, or students’ own choices. Leveraging GPA admission cutoffs from a centralized matching algorithm, I apply a regression discontinuity design (RDD) to examine whether low-SES students benefit from selective college majors. Scoring just above the cutoff for admission to a more selective major raises low-SES students’ income by 9% at age 30, partially closing the class gap in earnings. For high-SES students I find no detectable gain. To disentangle the contribution of major-specific returns from that of students’ choices as sources of inequality, I then estimate a joint model of college major choice and earnings in which returns depend on peer composition, using students’ rank-ordered application lists to correct for selection on unobservables. Low-SES returns exceed high-SES returns, relative to their outside options, across most of the major selectivity distribution. Current GPA-based meritocratic admissions are inefficient in terms of maximizing earnings: implementing need-affirmative admissions, holding capacity fixed, would reduce the class gap by 15% through upward mobility of disadvantaged students. Notably, the class gap in earnings could largely be eliminated if students selected college majors based on returns, though this requires expanding capacity. Thus, disparities persist not because disadvantaged students experience low returns from selective majors, but because of how seats are allocated and which majors students choose.

Keywords: Admission rules; earnings; policy impact; capacity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J01 J12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 89 pages
Date: 2026-08-16
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://nva.sikt.no/registration/01a01efca631-7131 ... 37-b211-3b5cc39482ce Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:nhheco:2026_010

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Paper Series in Economics from Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics NHH, Department of Economics, Helleveien 30, N-5045 Bergen, Norway. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Synne Stormoen ().