Are National Agricultural Panels Fit for Purpose? Parcel Instability, Land Rental Market Measurement, and Allocative Efficiency in Sub-Saharan Africa

Stein T. Holden () and Clifton Makate ()
Additional contact information
Stein T. Holden: Centre for Land Tenure Studies, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Postal: Centre for Land Tenure Studies, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, NO-1432 Aas, Norway
Clifton Makate: Centre for Land Tenure Studies, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Postal: Centre for Land Tenure Studies, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, NO-1432 Aas, Norway

No 4/26, CLTS Working Papers from Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Centre for Land Tenure Studies

Abstract: Land rental markets are often viewed as an important mechanism for improving allocative efficiency in smallholder agriculture. A growing literature has used nationally representative household panel data, particularly the LSMS–ISA surveys, to study land rental market participation and land allocation in Sub-Saharan Africa. However, the reliability of these analyses depends critically on how accurately land ownership and operational holdings and rental transactions are measured in the survey data.

This paper examines how measurement instability in reported land holdings affects empirical assessments of land rental markets and allocative efficiency. Using LSMS–ISA panel data from Ethiopia, Malawi, and Uganda, we document substantial instability in reported ownership holdings across survey rounds and show that this instability is systematically correlated with land rental participation. Rental land access statistics for landless and land-poor tenants are particularly sensitive to instability in reported ownership, with strong implications for the assessment of how pro-poor land rental markets are. We also find persistent large imbalances between reported tenant and landlord activity, suggesting substantial underreporting of rented out land.

We then assess allocative efficiency using three complementary approaches: the Bliss–Stern benchmark relating net land leasing to owned land, dynamic models of tenant participation, and conditional rental intensity models. The results indicate that ownership measurement instability can affect estimates of allocative efficiency, but tenant-side dynamics remain informative. Overall, the findings suggest that while survey-based estimates of landlord participation may be unreliable, nationally representative panel data can still provide useful insights into land rental market functioning and underlying reasons for limited adjustment when measurement constraints are explicitly addressed.

Keywords: Land rental market; allocative efficiency; data reliability policy relevance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C23 Q12 Q15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 35 pages
Date: 2026-05-14
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-inv
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://main-bvxea6i-kdsvgmpf4iwws.eu-5.platformsh ... _WP_04_26_full_0.pdf Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:nlsclt:2026_004

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CLTS Working Papers from Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Centre for Land Tenure Studies Centre for Land Tenure Studies, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, NO-1432 Aas, Norway. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Ephrida Tione ().