IB_4(46). Teaching Practices of University Faculty and Researchers

Margarita Kiryushina (), Yana Alekseeva () and Victor Rudakov ()
Additional contact information
Margarita Kiryushina: National Research University Higher School of Economics (Russian Federation)
Yana Alekseeva: National Research University Higher School of Economics (Russian Federation)
Victor Rudakov: National Research University Higher School of Economics (Russian Federation)

Monitoring of Education Markets and Organizations (MEMO), 2023, issue 5, 1-37

Abstract: The newsletter is devoted to the analysis of pedagogical practices of the faculty of the Russian universities in times of the end of COVID pandemic and changes in geopolitical situation. The study is based on the survey of university faculty and the survey of the faculty of universities and research organizations with high publication activity as a part of the Monitoring of education markets and organizations - 2022. The study focuses on the allocation and structure of faculty workload, time budget of university faculty, research supervision of students, practices of evaluation of the quality of education, use of distance learning techniques and accessibility of digital resources for studies in conditions of international sanctions, imposed on Russian Federation. The main conclusions of the issue: • During the last two decades, the teaching load has increased significantly mainly due to an increase in number of courses per faculty member. Faculty of leading and Moscow-based universities have lower educational workload compared to the faculty of other universities. • Sanctions against Russia affected professional practices of less than half of university faculty. Nevertheless, faculty of a leading and Moscow-based universities and research productive scholars are most sensitive to international restrictions as they are more integrated in international research networks. The main problem caused by sanctions is related to inaccessibility of research electronic libraries and digital resources for classes. • Changes, associated with introduction of online-teaching, digitalization of education appeared to be irreversible, since they were secured even after the pandemic. • The share of faculty, involved in private tutoring is 6%, which is considerably lower than 18% in the beginning of 2000-s. • Faculty members actively involve undergraduate and graduate students in their research teams. The younger a faculty member is, the more likely he or she is to involve undergraduate and graduate students in collaborative scholarly work. • Most faculty members were involved in procedures for assessing the quality of education. Employees of private universities more often indicated that their work was evaluated by students or other staff members according to special procedures.

Keywords: education institutions; preschool education; education market (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I21 I22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.hse.ru/data/2023/02/28/2032719144/ib_4(46)_2023.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hig:moneco:v::y:2023:i:5:p:1-37

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Monitoring of Education Markets and Organizations (MEMO) from National Research University Higher School of Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dina () and Dina ().