EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Truth of Taste: The Depth of Relativism

Tonya Manucharova ()
Additional contact information
Tonya Manucharova: National Research University Higher School of Economics

HSE Working papers from National Research University Higher School of Economics

Abstract: Three relativistic semantic theories were suggested for the statements of taste: indexicalism, propositional relativism and factual relativism. Comparing and contrasting these possible solutions, I invoke three problems Max Kolbel formulates and focus on the problem of disagreement. I challenge Iris Einheuser's theory and claim that while indexical approach underestimates the problem of disagreement, factual relativism overestimates it. Propositional relativism appears to provide the most sensible explanation of the phenomenon.

Keywords: relativism; truth; taste; semantics; indexicalism; contextualism; propositional relativism; factual relativism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Z (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 28 pages
Date: 2015
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in WP BRP Series: Humanities / HUM, July 2015, pages-28

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.hse.ru/data/2015/07/23/1085957629/102HUM2015.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hig:wpaper:102hum2015

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in HSE Working papers from National Research University Higher School of Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Shamil Abdulaev () and Shamil Abdulaev ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-16
Handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:102hum2015