Public Support for the Right to Euthanasia: The Competing Roles of Values and Religiosity Across 35 Nations

Maksim Rudnev and Aleksandra Savelkaeva
Additional contact information
Aleksandra Savelkaeva: National Research University Higher School of Economics

HSE Working papers from National Research University Higher School of Economics

Abstract: The determination of moral views has been frequently reduced to the effects of religiosity, although the effect of human values was acknowledged. This paper attempts to answer the question whether traditional religiosity is still the major regulator of moral attitudes and whether non-religious values have an independent impact. This is studied using attitudes toward euthanasia as a representative case of moral attitudes, since it is still widely discussed. At first, four hypotheses regarding the justifiability of euthanasia are reformulated regarding traditional religiosity, the values of autonomy, their interactions and effects of vulnerability. The multilevel analysis of the data from the 5th wave of World Values Survey showed that across 35 countries both traditional religiosity and human values have significant and independent impacts on the recognition of the right to euthanasia. Multilevel path analysis demonstrated that the effect of religiosity is partially mediated by the both values of autonomy and conservative ones. In addition, as a result of the low level of general public awareness of the topic, different kinds of capital have an inconsistent impact. We conclude with a discussion of the competing and additive roles of religiosity and the values of autonomy as modern regulators of public moral attitudes

Keywords: moral attitudes; euthanasia; basic values; World Values Survey; multilevel path analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 32 pages
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in WP BRP Series: Science, Psychology / PSY, April 2016, pages 1-32

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.hse.ru/data/2016/04/07/1127165123/59PSY2016.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hig:wpaper:59psy2016

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in HSE Working papers from National Research University Higher School of Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Shamil Abdulaev () and Shamil Abdulaev ().