The Relevance of Unrealistic Models for Empirical Political Science

Jon Hovi
Additional contact information
Jon Hovi: Department of Political Science, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

Homo Oeconomicus, 1998, vol. 15, 45-59

Abstract: This article focuses on the possible relevance of unrealistic models for empirical political science. The author rejects both the covering law program, according to which there is no place for unrealistic assumptions, as well as the Friedman-instrumentalist position, which argues that the validity of a model's assumptions is irrelevant. Instead, a third view is being offered, according to which scholarly work based on unrealistic models can be a highly legitimate activity, while at the same time decriptively accurate assumptions is retained as an important ideal for construction of theoretical models.

Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hom:homoec:v:15:y:1998:p:45-59

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Homo Oeconomicus from Institute of SocioEconomics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().