Ethical Integration in Public Sector AI. The Case of Algorithmic Systems in the Public Employment Service in Germany

Bernhard Bauer, Sabrina Mühlbauer, Kerstin Schlögl-Flierl, Enzo Weber and Paula Franziska Ziethmann
Additional contact information
Bernhard Bauer: Center for Responsible AI Technologies, and University of Augsburg, & Germany
Sabrina Mühlbauer: Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany
Kerstin Schlögl-Flierl: Center for Responsible AI Technologies, and University of Augsburg, & Germany
Enzo Weber: Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany ; University of Regensburg
Paula Franziska Ziethmann: Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany

No 202512, IAB-Discussion Paper from Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany]

Abstract: "This article addresses the ethical design of artificial intelligence (AI) in the public sector, with a particular focus on Public Employment Services (PES). While AI is increasingly employed to streamline administrative processes and improve service delivery, its application in employment mediation raises fundamental concerns regarding fairness, accountability, and democratic legitimacy. The EU Artificial Intelligence Act has further underscored the urgency of addressing these challenges by classifying employment-related AI systems as high-risk, thereby mandating robust safeguards to prevent discrimination and ensure transparency. The central aim of this study is to examine how ethical and social considerations can be systematically embedded in the development and implementation of public sector AI. Using the German PES as a case study, we introduce the “Embedded Ethics and Social Sciences” approach (EE), which integrates ethical reflection and practitioner involvement from the outset. Qualitative insights from interviews with caseworkers highlight the socio-technical challenges of implementation, particularly the need to reconcile efficiency with citizen trust. Building on these insights, we propose concrete design elements emerging from the integration of ethical and social considerations into system development. In this context, we discuss issues of data ethics and bias, fairness, and the role of explainable AI (XAI). Our analysis demonstrates that this framework not only supports compliance with new regulatory requirements but also strengthens human oversight and agency, and shared decision-making. More broadly, the findings suggest that ethically grounded design can enhance fairness, transparency, and legitimacy across diverse domains of public administration, thereby contributing to more accountable and citizen-centered governance in the digital era." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Keywords: IAB-Open-Access-Publikation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C49 J14 J16 J64 J71 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 32 pages
Date: 2025-10-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.48720/IAB.DP.2512

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iab:iabdpa:202512

DOI: 10.48720/IAB.DP.2512

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IAB-Discussion Paper from Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany] Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by IAB, Geschäftsbereich Informationsmanagement und Bibliothek ().