 U.S. HEALTH CARE: TOO MUCH OF A GOOD THING?Maury R. Randall, David Y. Suk and Kristin McCarthy International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 2021, vol. 14, issue 1, 19-33 Abstract: This paper provides a critique of the U.S. Health Care system compared to other OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) nations and extends the work of previous research in four ways. First, we identify which OECD countries have better longevity outcomes than other OECD nations while devoting a smaller percentage of their GDP (Gross National Product) to generating those results. Second, we examine whether increased levels of government healthcare funding are associated with longer life expectancy. Third, we discuss the question of whether healthcare spending is not being properly measured and the consequences if that is the case. Fourth, we consider the possibility that there might be too much total spending on healthcare in the U.S. and whether such excess spending might be having a negative effect on life expectancy. We conclude that there are many opportunities to successfully improve the U.S. system, lower costs and improve healthcare outcomes. Keywords: Health Care Expenditure; Life Expectancy; OECD (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ibf:ijmmre:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:19-33 Access Statistics for this article International Journal of Management and Marketing Research is currently edited by Terrance Jalbert More articles in International Journal of Management and Marketing Research from The Institute for Business and Finance Research |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.