EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Basic Procedures of Statistical Quality Control in Education

Irina Milnikova
Additional contact information
Irina Milnikova: Georgian Technical University

IBSU Scientific Journal, 2011, vol. 5, issue 2, 83-92

Abstract: General conceptions of quality management in education are discussed. It is shown that to make decisions of quality control more reliable and objective quantitative evaluation approaches should be used. The approach should be consisting of two stages: 1. elaboration of unitary scaling systems for student’s grades and 2. clear definition of quality standards. The first stage can be realized by means of equating methodology, particularly by means of equipercentile equating whereas the second one – by means of methodology of contingency tables. The methods allow: 1.comparing of distributions of grades of different subjects in different times and 2. on the base of historical (for the given educational institution) teaching level data specifying quality standards and their confidence levels.

Keywords: statistical quality control; scaling; quality standards; equipercentile equating; contingency tables (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I29 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journal.ibsu.edu.ge/index.php/ibsusj/article/download/208/202 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ibl:journl:v:5:y:2011:i:2:p:83-92

Access Statistics for this article

IBSU Scientific Journal is currently edited by Giuli Alasania

More articles in IBSU Scientific Journal from International Black Sea University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Salavat Sayfullin ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ibl:journl:v:5:y:2011:i:2:p:83-92