Preplant Herbicide Programs for the Control of Multiple-Herbicide-Resistant Waterhemp in No-Till Corn

Nader Soltani, Christian A. Willemse and Peter H. Sikkema

Journal of Agricultural Science, 2024, vol. 16, issue 4, 1-7

Abstract: Multiple-herbicide-resistant (MHR) waterhemp has been confirmed in 18 Ontario counties. A total of four experiments were conducted in commercial fields with MHR waterhemp in 2020 and 2021 to evaluate preplant (PP) herbicide tank mixtures for control of MHR waterhemp in no-till corn. There was minimal visible corn injury from the herbicide treatments evaluated. At 2 WAA, all herbicide tank mixtures provided greater than 90% control of MHR waterhemp except for pyroxasulfone/carfentrazone + atrazine which controlled MHR waterhemp 85%. At 12 WAA, S-metolachlor/mesotrione/atrazine, S-metolachlor/mesotrione/bicyclopyrone/atrazine, and diflufenican + atrazine + flufenacet controlled MHR waterhemp 86, 91, and 98%, respectively; all other herbicide tank mixtures provided 65 to 83% control. At 8 WAA, S-metolachlor/mesotrione/bicyclopyrone/atrazine and diflufenican + atrazine + flufenacet reduced MHR waterhemp density 97 and 100%, respectively similar to the weed-free control; all other herbicide tank mixtures reduced MHR waterhemp density 64 to 96%. At 8 WAA, S-saflufenacil/dimethenamid-P + mesotrione, S-metolachlor/mesotrione/atrazine, tembotrione + dicamba + flufenacet, metolachlor/mesotrione/bicyclopyrone/atrazine, and diflufenican + atrazine + flufenacet reduced MHR waterhemp biomass 96, 97, 98, 98, and 100%, respectively; all other herbicide tank mixtures reduced MHR waterhemp biomass 72 to 93%. MHR waterhemp interference reduced corn yield 80% in this study. All herbicide tank mixtures resulted in corn yield that was similar to the weed-free control. Among the herbicide tank mixtures evaluated S-metolachlor/mesotrione/bicyclopyrone/atrazine and diflufenican + atrazine + flufenacet provided the greatest control of MHR waterhemp in no-till corn.

Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/0/0/49939/54012 (application/pdf)
https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/0/49939 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1-7

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Agricultural Science from Canadian Center of Science and Education Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Canadian Center of Science and Education ().