How Two Fundamentally Different Geology and Glacial History Paradigms Address the Schoharie Creek Drainage Route Problem, New York State, USA

Eric Clausen

Journal of Geography and Geology, 2025, vol. 17, issue 1, 51

Abstract: This report compares the ability of two fundamentally different geology and glacial history paradigms to explain how eastern New York State’s unusual Schoharie Creek drainage route originated. What makes the drainage route unusual is west-oriented Schoharie Creek headwaters begin at two 300-meter-deep gaps in the 800-meter-high east-facing Catskill Eastern Escarpment (which is also the Hudson River valley’s western boundary) and then flow in a west, northwest, and north direction to eventually reach the southeast-flowing Mohawk River which flows to the south-oriented Hudson River. After traveling 280 kilometers in an almost complete circle Schoharie Creek headwaters eventually pass a point that is approximately 600 meters lower and 16 kilometers away from where Schoharie Creek begins. A geologic literature review demonstrates the Schoharie Creek drainage route origin problem attracted the attention of late 19th and early 20th century geologists and physical geographers, but the accepted geology and glacial history paradigm which has been evolving over the past 150 years did not and still does not provide the necessary mechanisms required for researchers to determine what formed the unusual Schoharie Creek drainage route. However, a new geology and glacial history paradigm which was developed by using Missouri River drainage basin drainage system and erosional landform evidence and which uses two linked icesheets, the first of which created and occupied a deep “hole” in the North American continent and which also generated immense and long-lived meltwater floods, is able to provide a logical, internally consistent, and simple Schoharie Creek drainage route origin problem solution that also explains how many other Catskill Mountain region drainage system and erosional landform features originated.

Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jgg/article/download/0/0/51659/56183 (application/pdf)
https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jgg/article/view/0/51659 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ibn:jggjnl:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:51

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Geography and Geology from Canadian Center of Science and Education Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Canadian Center of Science and Education ().