When Winning is Everything: Majoritarian Electoral System and Political Vigilantism in Contemporary Ghanaian Politics

Owusu Nkrumah Daniel and Ebenezer Barnes

Journal of Politics and Law, 2026, vol. 19, issue 2, 67

Abstract: This article examines the persistence of political vigilantism in Ghana’s electoral politics by situating it within the institutional dynamics of the majoritarian first-past-the-post (FPTP) electoral system. While Ghana is widely regarded as a democratic outlier in Africa due to its record of peaceful elections and democratic alternation of power, recurrent episodes of electoral violence and vigilantism continue to undermine its electoral integrity. Drawing on secondary data, such as electoral records, legal documents, and existing scholarly literature, the study interrogates how the Ghanaian electoral system shapes political behaviour, particularly the resort to extra-legal strategies by political actors. The findings indicate that the winner-takes-all nature of the FPTP system, where even narrow defeats result in complete political exclusion, motivates electoral violence. This structural incentive encourages political parties, especially the dominant New Patriotic Party and the National Democratic Congress, to mobilize vigilante groups, mostly unemployed and poor youth, as instruments for vote protection, opponent intimidation, and control of electoral spaces. This study further demonstrates that the concentration of executive powers, two-party dominance, localized constituency competition, and recurring electoral legitimacy disputes collectively reinforce vigilantism as a rational response to the institutional flaws, insecurity and mistrust in state agencies, particularly the Electoral Commission and security services. Although legal measures such as the Vigilantism and Related Offences Act 2019 have been introduced to address the symptoms rather than the structural roots of the problem. The article concludes that meaningful reduction of political vigilantism in Ghana requires electoral and institutional reforms, including proportional representation, which has proven its inclusivity, strengthened trust in democratic governance, and reduced violence.

Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jpl/article/download/0/0/53065/57864 (application/pdf)
https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jpl/article/view/0/53065 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ibn:jpl123:v:19:y:2026:i:2:p:67

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Politics and Law from Canadian Center of Science and Education Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Canadian Center of Science and Education ().