Unfunded Mandates, Institutional Quality, and Social Progress: An Analysis for OECD Countries

Miriam Hortas-Rico and David Martinez-Algora

No WP2501, IDEAGOV Working Papers from IDEAGOV - International Center for Decentralization and Governance

Abstract: This paper examines the impact of unfunded mandates —defined as the mismatch between political and fiscal decentralisation— on social progress, and how this relationship is contingent upon different levels of institutional quality. Using data from 35 OECD countries over the period 1995–2017 within an Instrumental Variables framework, our results indicate that unfunded mandates are negatively associated to social progress. However, institutional quality plays a crucial role in mitigating these adverse effects. These findings highlight the importance of (i) effective decentralisation design that ensures alignment between its fiscal and political dimensions, and (ii) strengthening institutions to ensure that decentralisation processes positively contribute to national development and social progress.

Keywords: fiscal decentralisation; political decentralisation; well-being; institutional quality; OECD (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C26 H77 I31 O10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 34 pages
Date: 2025-12-15
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://repec.ideagov.eu/RePEc/ida/wpaper/WP2501.pdf First version, 2025 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ida:wpaper:wp2501

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IDEAGOV Working Papers from IDEAGOV - International Center for Decentralization and Governance Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by IDEAGOV - International Center for Decentralization and Governance ().