EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The economic effects of new PPP accounting treatments: a critical analysis of the IPSAS 32

Nicola Moscariello and Ettore Cinque

Global Business and Economics Review, 2016, vol. 18, issue 3/4, 310-319

Abstract: Public-private partnerships (PPPs) represent a fundamental instrument to bridge the 'infrastructure gap' in the Eurozone. The accounting treatment for PPPs influences the diffusion of PPP practices and the effectiveness and efficiency of these contracts. Notwithstanding the existence of contrasting theories regarding the way to record PPPs contracts, the International Public Sector Accounting Standard Board (IPSASB) has recently issued the accounting standard IPSAS 32 proposing to switch from the mostly applied 'risks and rewards' to a 'control' approach. Although the 'control' approach presents important advantages relative to the 'risks and rewards' criterion, scientific arguments clearly supporting the former financial reporting model over the latter still lack, while macro-economic drawbacks associated to potential pro-cyclical effects of the 'control' approach are likely to emerge. Therefore, an accurate 'effect analysis' should be carried out by the European Union before adopting the IPSAS 32.

Keywords: public-private partnerships; PPPs; control approach; economic effects; pro-cyclicality; financial reporting; IPSAS 32; infrastructure gap; accounting standards; European Union. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=76237 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:18:y:2016:i:3/4:p:310-319

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Global Business and Economics Review from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:18:y:2016:i:3/4:p:310-319