 The nature of scientific progress in organisational researchValentina Tymoshenko International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 2021, vol. 14, issue 2, 154-167 Abstract: Organisational theories differ from theories in natural sciences and many theories in social sciences as they are too ambiguous to be tested empirically and there are no competition and natural selection between different theories. In addition, different philosophical assumptions held by organisational researchers from different camps prevent this selection. Given this fragmented nature of organisational sciences and the eclectic nature of organisational theories, which precludes its empirical testing and natural selection, the paper asks and discusses what is meant by progress in social sciences in general and in organisational research in particular. The progress in organisational sciences is equated to theory development as the end in itself while the latest consists from observations and classifications instead of generalisations and increase in explanatory and predictive power. The position that organisational theories should be accessible to empirical tests by clearly delineating their domain of application is defended. Keywords: scientific progress; organisational theories; philosophy of science; theoretical contribution; institutional theory. (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:14:y:2021:i:2:p:154-167 Access Statistics for this article More articles in International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.