CONWIP: closed or semi-open queuing network?

Sunderesh S. Heragu and Aman Gupta

International Journal of Operational Research, 2015, vol. 24, issue 3, 356-367

Abstract: Closed queuing networks (CQNs) are generally used to model CONWIP systems. An implicit assumption in the CQN model is that whenever the work-in-process (WIP) level goes below the set value, there is always a job waiting for the released kanban. In other words, there are an infinite number of jobs in the external queue and as a result the kanban never waits in the resource pool. Modelling the CONWIP under this unrealistic assumption tends to underestimate the true cycle time of the kanban (and the job). In this technical note, we represent a CONWIP as a semi-open queuing network (SOQN) in which the job waits in the external queue until a kanban is available or vice-versa. Using published data and numerical experiments, we point out a modelling flaw of CONWIP systems in the literature and also show that the SOQN approach is a more appropriate model for representing CONWIP systems.

Keywords: closed queuing networks; CQN; semi-open queuing networks; SOQN; simulation; modelling; operational research; CONstant Work-in-Process; CONWIP; kanban; WIP. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=72233 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijores:v:24:y:2015:i:3:p:356-367

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Operational Research from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().