In-house production vs. outsourcing: the effect of volume-based learning on quality competition

Yanni Ping and Seung-Lae Kim

International Journal of Operational Research, 2022, vol. 45, issue 3, 344-361

Abstract: This paper considers an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) who outsources finished products to a contract manufacturer (CM), who adopts the OEM's existing technology and achieves quality improvement through learning-by-doing. Besides the role of upstream partner, the CM also becomes a downstream competitor. We examine learning-by-doing and quality dynamically under a two-period model - both for cases when quality competition exists and does not exist. We identify the conditions under which pure outsourcing, partial outsourcing, or non-outsourcing is most advantageous. When there is no quality competition and when the CM's quality improvement does not hurt the OEM's future demand, we find that it would still be beneficial for the OEM to apply a partial outsourcing strategy. When quality competition exists, the OEM's decision in the second period follows the same pattern as the non-competition case, while the CM's wholesale price depends on the tradeoff between selling through the OEM and selling independently.

Keywords: learning-by-doing; outsourcing; quality-improvement; competitive CM. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=127135 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijores:v:45:y:2022:i:3:p:344-361

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Operational Research from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().