BREXIT NEGOTIATION ROUNDS FROM 2020
Petre Prisecaru
Euroinfo, 2020, vol. 4, issue 2, 99-113
Abstract:
After four rounds of videoconference Brexit negotiations taken place in Brussels and Londonin March, April, May and June, the results are quite disappointing, at least according to officialstatements delivered by Michel Barnier, the European Commission's chief negotiator, after eachround. Ensuring the implementation of the Withdrawal Agreement and the Political Declarationremains only a desideratum and progress on the 11 areas of negotiation is modest. Divergences havepersisted, in particular in the area of trade agreement, the provision of a level playing field or fair andundistorted competition, judicial and police cooperation in criminal matters, the governance of thefuture agreement, and on fisheries. The United Kingdom rejected the idea of extending the transitionperiod, and implicitly further negotiations, as well as concluding a single agreement, with a generalgovernance structure. Britain's exit without an agreement and the failure to negotiate a futurepartnership to limit the negative consequences of Brexit seem like possible scenarios.
Keywords: Brexit; round of negotiations; progress; divergence; cooperation; agreement; partnership (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F13 F15 F22 F36 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.iem.ro/rem/index.php/euroinfo/article/view/758/842 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iem:eurinf:v:4:y:2020:i:2:p:99-113
Access Statistics for this article
Euroinfo is currently edited by Simona Moagar Poladian, PhD
More articles in Euroinfo from Institute for World Economy, Romanian Academy Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ionela Baltatescu ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).