Analysis of Risk and Reliability in Project Delivery Methods
Robert Schultz,
Ahmad Sarfaraz and
Kouroush Jenab
Additional contact information
Robert Schultz: Department of Systems Engineering & Management, California State University, Northridge, CA, USA
Ahmad Sarfaraz: Department of Systems Engineering & Management, California State University, Northridge, CA, USA
Kouroush Jenab: Society of Reliability Engineering-Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences (IJSDS), 2013, vol. 4, issue 3, 54-65
Abstract:
Risk and reliability are two main factors that must be studied in order to measure the successful rate of a project. As a result, innovative project delivery methods have been proposed to mitigate the risk and improve reliability of a project. The intent of this study is to compare the use of the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) and fuzzy AHP for decisions surrounding the early stages of construction projects based on risk and reliability measures. Financial risk is especially high during the early design stages of a project due to the unknown obstacles that will follow. The case study uses the selection of a project delivery method as an example, and provides a sample project to highlight the project-specific variability of the multi-criteria decision analysis.
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve. ... 4018/jsds.2013070103 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:igg:jsds00:v:4:y:2013:i:3:p:54-65
Access Statistics for this article
International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences (IJSDS) is currently edited by Saeed Tabar
More articles in International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences (IJSDS) from IGI Global
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journal Editor ().