In Defense of the ‘Human Prejudice’

Tatiana Patrone
Additional contact information
Tatiana Patrone: Department of Philosophy and Religion, Ithaca College, Ithaca, NY, USA

International Journal of Technoethics (IJT), 2013, vol. 4, issue 1, 26-38

Abstract: Those who favor genetic enhancement of human beings (‘trans-humanists’) tend to hold that there is nothing special about being human, if by ‘human’ people mean ‘being member of the species homo sapiens’. They reject the arguments of bio-conservatives as prejudicial toward the concept of humanity, and they argue that species-membership in general is morally irrelevant. In ‘The Human Prejudice’, Bernard Williams defends what he calls ‘humanism’ (and what others call ‘speciesism’) and argues that species-membership is a morally relevant fact about us. Williams’s argument has been criticized by many, and in this paper, the author, focuses on the most thorough attack by Julian Savulescu. They provide a diagnosis of why accounts such as his seem to be so misguided to trans-humanists (like Savulescu) and the author then defend Williams’s account. In short, the paper argues that there is nothing obviously wrong with being a speciesist.

Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve. ... .4018/jte.2013010103 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:igg:jt0000:v:4:y:2013:i:1:p:26-38

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Technoethics (IJT) is currently edited by Steven Umbrello

More articles in International Journal of Technoethics (IJT) from IGI Global
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journal Editor ().