Behavioral Science---“Oh Harvard” (Business Review)

Daniel N. Braunstein
Additional contact information
Daniel N. Braunstein: School of Economics and Management, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan 48063

Interfaces, 1974, vol. 4, issue 2, 39-41

Abstract: One of the major concerns of most behavioral scientists who study the management of organizations is that their “public” understand the general nature of the theory they are trying to develop and have sympathy with the research methods used in developing this theory. Yet, I have the strong suspicion that the leading publication, by far, in terms of influence with the management public, the Harvard Business Review , has not responsibly informed its readers of current Behavioral Science developments. In fact, on the basis of informal data I have collected, I suspect that the Federal Trade Commission might want to consider HBR in violation of the “truth-in-labeling” act!

Date: 1974
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.4.2.39 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:orinte:v:4:y:1974:i:2:p:39-41

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Interfaces from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().