Integrating Price-Incentive and Trip-Selection Policies to Rebalance Shared Electric Vehicles

Zihao Jiao (), Lun Ran (), Xin Liu (), Yuli Zhang () and Robin G. Qiu ()
Additional contact information
Zihao Jiao: School of International Economics and Management, Beijing Technology and Business University, 100048 Beijing, China
Lun Ran: School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, 100081 Beijing, China; Sustainable Development Research Institute for Economy and Society of Beijing, 100081 Beijing, China
Xin Liu: School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, 100081 Beijing, China; Sustainable Development Research Institute for Economy and Society of Beijing, 100081 Beijing, China
Yuli Zhang: School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, 100081 Beijing, China; Sustainable Development Research Institute for Economy and Society of Beijing, 100081 Beijing, China
Robin G. Qiu: Big Data Laboratory, Division of Engineering and Information Science, Pennsylvania State University, Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355

Service Science, 2020, vol. 12, issue 4, 148-173

Abstract: Because electric vehicle sharing (EVS) offers the advantages of high flexibility and convenience, it has been receiving increasing attention worldwide as an effective approach to easing traffic congestion and environmental pollution. However, unbalanced electric vehicle distribution is an obstacle in the development of EVS. In this paper, we propose an integrated strategy to mitigate the imbalance issue and enhance customers’ adoption of EVS. We construct an integrated strategy that combines the price-incentive approach with the trip-selection policy and models uncertain travel demand in a continuous trip-adopting process based on our integrated strategy. Aiming to improve EVS operating profits, we apply spatiotemporal nonlinear mixed-integer programming to formulate the travel pricing and rebalancing plan. Additionally, we approximate the model in a tractable form after analyzing the optimal service adoption and develop an efficient exact algorithm to handle the nonlinear items. The computational results of a real-world car2go Amsterdam case study demonstrate several economic and environmental benefits generated by our integrated policy, including (i) higher profits for EVS operators, (ii) improved service satisfaction for consumers, and (iii) a higher level of carbon emissions reduction, from 381 grams per mile to 225 grams per mile, beneficial for the social environment. Moreover, according to the case study, an appropriate initial fleet size, high rebalancing frequency, low labor cost, high potential travel demands, and short charging time also benefit EVS operation.

Keywords: sharing economy; sustainable operations; electric vehicle sharing service; price incentive policy; imbalance problem (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.2020.0266 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:orserv:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:148-173

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Service Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().