 Metacompetition: Competing over the Game to Be PlayedWilliam P. Barnett ()
Strategy Science, 2017, vol. 2, issue 4, 212-219 Abstract: Strategy research often studies competitions among organizations and defines the winners of these competitions as “great.” But we typically treat as a given the specific formal and informal rules of the game, the logics, that govern these competition. Yet the logics governing competitions themselves are decided through a higher-level “metacompetition” with other possible logics. Metacompetitions determine who can compete, how they can compete, the criteria that will be used to evaluate success and failure, and the payoffs to competition. When we ask “where do great strategies come from” but ignore metacompetition, we take as a given the very process that gives us the rules by which we determine greatness. In this paper I argue that to understand where great strategies come from, we must first understand how metacompetition determines which logics prevail in a market. I develop an ecological model of metacompetition, and I estimate the model using data on metacompetition in the digital music distribution industry. Keywords: competitive advantage; competitive strategy; organizational ecology; emerging industries; industry dynamics; information technology; organization and management theory; organizational form; technological change; technology strategy (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:orstsc:v:2:y:2017:i:4:p:212-219 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Strategy Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.