Residential Stability or Rational Bubble: Proposition 13 in Southern California

Mark Hoven Stohs () and Yun W. Park
Additional contact information
Mark Hoven Stohs: Department of Finance, College of Business and Economics, California State University, Fullerton, CA 92834
Yun W. Park: Department of Finance, College of Business and Economics, California State University, Fullerton, CA 92834

International Real Estate Review, 2007, vol. 10, issue 1, 26-47

Abstract: California’s Proposition 13, which limits the growth of property tax to 2 percent per year, provides homeowners an incentive to remain in their housing units and thus contributes to residential stability. Yet, with fast home price appreciation, new home buyers may purchase a home and then sell it again within a short period of time. Even though they incur transaction costs, they can gain by the appreciation. Under Proposition 13, faced with a disproportionately large property tax relative to those homeowners who purchased their homes a long time ago at a much lower price, the new homebuyers have an additional incentive to trade homes fast in an up market to avoid paying a high property tax. We call this short term residential trading ‘Proposition 13 risk arbitrage’ and predict that Proposition 13 induces additional short-term residential trading, which adds to the underlying residential market speculation. Cross-sectional variations of the residential holding periods over the 1993 to 2001 period in the five counties of Southern California are generally consistent with the predictions based on Proposition 13 induced trading: Households which face a higher property tax per square foot and those that experience larger capital gains show a shorter holding period. We also explain the time variation of the aggregate residential holding period using the Proposition 13 risk arbitrage argument.

Keywords: Proposition 13; property tax; residential holding period decision; residential stability; risk arbitrage; Proposition 13 risk arbitrage (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L85 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.gssinst.org/irer/wp-content/uploads/20 ... -rational-bubble.pdf Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ire:issued:v:10:n:01:2007:p:26-47

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Global Social Science Institute, 9200 Corporate Blvd., Suite 420 Rockville, MD 20850
https://www.gssinst.org/gssinst/index.html

Access Statistics for this article

International Real Estate Review is currently edited by Professor Sing Tien Foo and Professor Ko Wang

More articles in International Real Estate Review from Global Social Science Institute Global Social Science Institute, 9200 Corporate Blvd., Suite 420 Rockville, MD 20850.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by IRER Graduate Assistant/Webmaster ().