Inefficiencies and Market Power in Financial Arbitrage: A Study of California's Electricity Markets
Severin Borenstein,
James Bushnell,
Christopher Knittel and
Catherine Wolfram
Staff General Research Papers Archive from Iowa State University, Department of Economics
Abstract:
For two years prior to the collapse of Californiaï¾’s restructured electricity market, power traded in both a forward and a spot market for delivery at the same times and locations. Nonetheless, prices in the two markets often differed in significant and predictable ways. This apparent inefficiency persisted, we argue, because most firms believed that trading on inter-market price differences would yield regulatory penalties. For the few firms that did make such trades, it was not profit- maximizing to eliminate the price differences entirely. Skyrocketing prices in 2000 changed the major buyersï¾’ (utilitiesï¾’) incentives and exacerbated the price differentials between the markets.
Date: 2008-06-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (44)
Published in Journal of Industrial Economics, June 2008, vol. 56 no. 2, pp. 347-378
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
Journal Article: INEFFICIENCIES AND MARKET POWER IN FINANCIAL ARBITRAGE: A STUDY OF CALIFORNIA'S ELECTRICITY MARKETS* (2008) 
Working Paper: Inefficiencies and Market Power in Financial Arbitrage: A Study of California?s Electricity Markets (2006) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:isu:genres:13133
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Staff General Research Papers Archive from Iowa State University, Department of Economics Iowa State University, Dept. of Economics, 260 Heady Hall, Ames, IA 50011-1070. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Curtis Balmer ().