Do Internal and International Remittances Affect Households' Expenditure and Asset Accumulation Differently? Evidence From Bangladesh

Mustafa Kamal and Ebney Ayaj Rana ()
Additional contact information
Ebney Ayaj Rana: Unnayan Onneshan, Bangladesh

Journal of Developing Areas, 2019, vol. 53, issue 2, 139-153

Abstract: At the household level, remittances are considered to affect consumption and asset accumulation patterns and thus contribute to household welfare. This paper attempts to examine whether expenditure and asset accumulation across the remittance recipient households in Bangladesh vary according to internal and international remittance incomes. The paper employs the propensity score matching technique to estimate the average treatment effect on the treated as a measure of the impact of remittances on expenditure and asset accumulation for the households that have migrant family members. For doing so, it uses data from the Household Income and Expenditure Survey 2010. In addition, this study carries out Rosenbaum bounds sensitivity analysis to test the sensitivity of results. The results suggest that the effects of remittances on household spending pattern vary widely between households with internal migrants and those with international migrants. In case of international remittances, the results demonstrate significant positive increase in education expenditure and other expenditure category (e.g., fuel and transportation), and rise in land and property purchase. Households with international migrants also spend significantly lower percentage of incomes on food expenditure. In case of internal remittances, either the effects are insignificant compared to that of international remittances or the results from internal remittance recipient households are extremely sensitive to claim to be different than that from the households with no migrants. The overall effects of remittance on household expenditure and asset accumulation thus appear little in the country, although international remittance incomes tend to contribute to household welfare notably compared to internal remittance incomes. Such finding raises potential alarm before the policymakers and reveals the importance of actions at the appropriate level to ensure better utilization of remittance incomes, especially in the areas of domestic economic environment and institutions.

Keywords: Remittance; Household Expenditure; Asset Accumulation; Propensity Score Matching (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F22 F24 R23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://muse.jhu.edu/article/703001/pdf

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jda:journl:vol.53:year:2019:issue2:pp:139-153

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Developing Areas from Tennessee State University, College of Business Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Abu N.M. Wahid ().