Hegemonic Media and Polarized Discourses: An Analysis of Disinformation Narratives in Indian Media

Farhan Ahmad, Anam Shams, Khalid Amin, Sohaib Alam, Sadaf Khalid, Shafey Anwarul Haque and Wahaj Unnisa Warda

World Journal of English Language, 2025, vol. 15, issue 4, 144

Abstract: There is a growing concern that disinformation, particularly transmitted through mobile phones, television, and social media, is fuelling social tension and even violence at times. Ample evidence, along with anecdotal interpretations, is available to illustrate how digital and mainstream media platforms in India have turned into pernicious channels for spreading hatred and violence. The proposed study investigates how propaganda, disinformation and fake news are used as polarization tools to elevate a particular political ideology or practice in a democracy like India. The study highlights a series of events and hashtags used on X (earlier Twitter) and other social platforms using derogatory language or agendas against communities and people of dissent. The media is wielded as a tool to spread polarized discourses that serve the interest of the ruling dispensation. Using some examples of fake news and propaganda, this paper draws attention to media propaganda and its effects on minorities, Muslims in particular, and human intellect in general. The research looks at how political goals shape propaganda definitions and signs, symbols, or languages used against minorities, who are largely portrayed as 'others' in the country. Additionally, it delves into the strategies and techniques employed by prejudiced media to shape reality, as well as how they undermine cultural norms and promote divisive policies of the ruling regime. The investigation of specific texts, videos, and audios will support the study. The findings reveal that such propagandised media or sources of information can have both positive and negative effects on the democratic process. The study uses some cases as examples to show how disinformation or media manipulation restricts the freedom of expression, food habits, mobility, and affiliation of the country's minorities. This is troubling because stigma can lead to more hostile attitudes toward integration or weaken one's sense of belonging in democracies.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/download/27416/16813 (application/pdf)
https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/view/27416 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:15:y:2025:i:4:p:144

Access Statistics for this article

World Journal of English Language is currently edited by Joe Nelson

More articles in World Journal of English Language from Sciedu Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sciedu Press ().