The Impasse of Post Keynesian Distribution Theory

C. Thomasberger

Journal of Income Distribution, 1992, vol. 01, issue 1, 4-4

Abstract: Why did the topic of income distribution loose its attraction for the economic profession? The article analyzes the structure of the Ricardian theory and of the post-Keynesian approach and discusses the question why after Pasinetti’s contribution distribution theory lost its economic significance and interpretative value. An alternative and less deterministic approach to functional distribution is proposed, taking into consideration the importance of money and expectations, the relation between the principle of effective demand and aggregate income and the difference between the behavior of the single entrepreneur and the macroeconomic system.

Date: 1992
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://jid.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/jid/article/view/754 (application/pdf)
Some fulltext downloads are only available to subscribers. See JID website for details.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jid:journl:y:1992:v:01:i:1:p:4-4

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Income Distribution from Ad libros publications inc. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Timm Boenke ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).