Poverty and Income Inequality: Markets and Governments in the International Economy

Kishor Thanawala

Journal of Income Distribution, 1998, vol. 07, issue 2, 5-5

Abstract: Increases in aggregate national income are not always accompanied by reductions in levels of poverty or by decreases in the magnitudes of Gini coefficients. The Kuznets “Inverted U” hypothesis (Kuznets, 1955, 1963) was based on statistical data relating to several of the contemporary developed countries. But it seems that a similar inverted-U relationship between per capita income and Gini coefficient may form a viable hypothesis on the global level. If so, economic progress measured in terms of per capita income does not, in practice, result in people having greater freedom because increase in per capita income does not necessarily decrease the level of poverty rate and therefore does not always reduce the constraint imposed by the need to satisfy basic wants. This paper discusses some empirical and normative aspects of global poverty and income distribution and the role that markets and governments play in the international economy.

Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://jid.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/jid/article/view/647 (application/pdf)
Some fulltext downloads are only available to subscribers. See JID website for details.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jid:journl:y:1998:v:07:i:2:p:5-5

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Income Distribution from Ad libros publications inc. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Timm Boenke ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).