Comparisons of Estimation Procedures for Nonlinear Multilevel Models

Ali Reza Fotouhi

Journal of Statistical Software, 2003, vol. 008, issue i09

Abstract: We introduce General Multilevel Models and discuss the estimation procedures that may be used to fit multilevel models. We apply the proposed procedures to three-level binary data generated in a simulation study. We compare the procedures by two criteria, Bias and efficiency. We find that the estimates of the fixed effects and variance components are substantially and significantly biased using Longford's Approximation and Goldstein's Generalized Least Squares approaches by two software packages VARCL and ML3. These estimates are not significantly biased and are very close to real values when we use Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) using Gibbs sampling or Nonparametric Maximum Likelihood (NPML) approach. The Gaussian Quadrature (GQ) approach, even with small number of mass points results in consistent estimates but computationally problematic. We conclude that the MCMC and the NPML approaches are the recommended procedures to fit multilevel models.

Date: 2003-05-01
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.jstatsoft.org/index.php/jss/article/view/v008i09/Paper-1.pdf
https://www.jstatsoft.org/index.php/jss/article/do ... ile/v008i09/code.txt

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jss:jstsof:v:008:i09

DOI: 10.18637/jss.v008.i09

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Statistical Software is currently edited by Bettina Grün, Edzer Pebesma and Achim Zeileis

More articles in Journal of Statistical Software from Foundation for Open Access Statistics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().