EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Are Stars’ Opinions Worth More? The Relation Between Analyst Reputation and Recommendation Values

Lily Fang () and Ayako Yasuda ()

Journal of Financial Services Research, 2014, vol. 46, issue 3, 235-269

Abstract: Using 1994–2009 data, we find that All-American (AA) analysts’ buy and sell portfolio alphas significantly exceed those of non-AAs by up to 0.6 % per month after risk-adjustments for investors with advance access to analyst recommendations. For investors without such access, top-rank AAs still earn significantly higher (by 0.3 %) monthly alphas in buy recommendations than others. AAs’ superior performance exists before (as well as after) they are elected, is not explained by market overreactions to stars, and is not significantly eroded after Reg-FD. Election to top-AA ranks predicts future performance in buy recommendations above and beyond other previously observable analyst characteristics. Institutional investors actively evaluate analysts and update the AA roster accordingly. Collectively, these results suggest that skill differences among analysts exist and AA election reflects institutional investors’ ability to evaluate and benefit from elected analysts’ superior skills. Other investors’ opportunity to profit from the stars’ opinions exists, but is limited due to their timing disadvantage. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Keywords: Analyst reputation; Star status; Stock recommendations; Institutional investors; Performance evaluation; G1; G2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (32)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10693-013-0178-y (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jfsres:v:46:y:2014:i:3:p:235-269

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10693

DOI: 10.1007/s10693-013-0178-y

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Financial Services Research is currently edited by Haluk Unal

More articles in Journal of Financial Services Research from Springer, Western Finance Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:kap:jfsres:v:46:y:2014:i:3:p:235-269