The impact of gender quotas on corporate boards: a cross-country comparative study

Guclu Atinc (), Saurabh Srivastava and Sonia Taneja
Additional contact information
Guclu Atinc: Texas A&M University – Commerce
Saurabh Srivastava: Texas A&M University – Commerce
Sonia Taneja: Texas A&M University – Commerce

Journal of Management & Governance, 2022, vol. 26, issue 3, No 1, 685-706

Abstract: Abstract Drawing on institutional theory and resource dependence theory, this study examines whether mandating gender quotas for corporate boards is associated with a greater presence of women on boards, better accounting-based and market-based performance, more innovativeness, and more external female directors. Based on a cross-country comparative sample of companies from 18 countries, our results suggest that organizations in countries where gender quotas are implemented show better market-based performance and better board vigilance through a higher number of external directors than organizations in countries where quotas are not implemented. The direct impact of gender quotas on innovativeness and accounting performance is not observed. Our findings add to the institutional theory literature by suggesting that companies respond strategically and show acquiescence in their strategic response when institutional pressure addresses ethical concerns (gender diversity). The results support institutional theory’s contentions that companies from countries mandating gender quotas are valued more highly by the market. Nevertheless, the impacts on accounting performance and innovativeness are not apparent. Additionally, adopting a resource dependence approach, we find that the presence of women on boards is associated with more efficient corporate governance practices. The results of this study demonstrate the positive implications of gender quotas for company boards. The upper echelons of companies and country policymakers may better understand the importance of diversity and the presence of female directors on company boards.

Keywords: Gender quota; Gender diversity; Organizational outcomes; Institutional pressure; Organizational legitimacy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10997-020-09562-6 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jmgtgv:v:26:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10997-020-09562-6

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... 29/journal/10997/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10997-020-09562-6

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Management & Governance is currently edited by Lino Cinquini

More articles in Journal of Management & Governance from Springer, Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().