Max-U? Considering humanomics in public policy

Ryan Yonk (), Robertas Bakula (), Raymond March () and Veeshan Rayamajhee ()
Additional contact information
Ryan Yonk: American Institute for Economic Research
Robertas Bakula: Ayn Rand Institute
Raymond March: Angelo State University
Veeshan Rayamajhee: New Mexico State University

Public Choice, 2025, vol. 202, issue 3, No 10, 483-493

Abstract: Abstract Humanomics, an approach to studying human behavior championed by Vernon Smith, Bart Wilson, and Deirdre McCloskey, is rooted in an acknowledgment that human beings self-examine their conduct and sentiments. The economic way of thinking, therefore, must be located within the mass of evidence about human behavior produced outside of its neoclassical silo. Since public choice and public policy analysis, in general, have inherited much of their methodologies from economics, the lessons of humanomics apply equally there, too. The overwhelmingly dominant method of economic analysis, Max-U-under-constraints, invites a policy activist to play with the “rules of the game” to nudge mechanically reacting maximizers toward desirable outcomes. In contrast, humanomics helps the analyst to identify the underlying causes of those outcomes in the ideas and actions, not mindless reactions, of thinking, knowing, and feeling humans. In addition to other achievements, the new approach already has produced, we argue that the humanomics framework provides a clear explanation and motivation for voluntary (uncompensated) human blood donations and offers plausible and testable answers to the open questions about the general success of that policy. For the policy analyst, humanomics suggests that policy proposals must ask more than just whether the policy is effective and efficient. Instead, it must ask whether the policy is consistent with how human beings act in the real world, under real circumstances, with real people.

Keywords: Humanomics; Public policy; Human actions; Max-U model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H89 Z13 Z18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11127-024-01218-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:202:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11127-024-01218-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ce/journal/11127/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s11127-024-01218-5

Access Statistics for this article

Public Choice is currently edited by WIlliam F. Shughart II

More articles in Public Choice from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().