Monocameralism versus Bicameralism în Sistemul Constitutional Romanesc - Unicameralism versus Bicameralism in the Romanian Constitutional System (Romanian version)

Magda-Ioana Iacob ()
Additional contact information
Magda-Ioana Iacob: “Petre Andrei” University from Iasi

Anuarul Universitatii „Petre Andrei” din Iasi / Year-Book „Petre Andrei” University from Iasi, Fascicula: Drept, Stiinte Economice, Stiinte Politice / Fascicle: Law, Economic Sciences, Political Sciences, 2010, vol. 1, issue 5, 92-96

Abstract: Most countries with unicameral parliaments are unitary, non-federal states. These states considered from the very beginning that they do not need a second Chamber, The Upper House, or they had it dissolved later. Unicameralism advocates argue that Upper House’s commonly features , The Senate in our case , and the review of the legislation can be accomplished for example by Parliament’s committees. The main critic brought to bicameralism system was that it is not suited for a unitary state, as Romania, because it slows the legislative process, meanwhile the unicameralism system would be less expensive.

Keywords: constitutional system; bicameralism; law; Romania; conflict (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A23 K10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://edituralumen.ro (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lum:rev11d:v:1:y:2010:i:5:p:92-96

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Anuarul Universitatii „Petre Andrei” din Iasi / Year-Book „Petre Andrei” University from Iasi, Fascicula: Drept, Stiinte Economice, Stiinte Politice / Fascicle: Law, Economic Sciences, Political Sciences from Editura Lumen, Department of Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Antonio Sandu ().