Rezmives and others against Romania. Case Study

Roxana-Alina Petraru ()
Additional contact information
Roxana-Alina Petraru: Rezmives and others against Romania. Case Study

Anuarul Universitatii „Petre Andrei” din Iasi / Year-Book „Petre Andrei” University from Iasi, Fascicula: Drept, Stiinte Economice, Stiinte Politice / Fascicle: Law, Economic Sciences, Political Sciences, 2017, issue 20, 65-68

Abstract: The Romanian penitentiary system suffers from overcrowding, improper detention conditions, insufficient security and medical staff. All these facts often result in a violation of Article 3 of the Convention by the Romanian state, which has led to many convictions and to obligations to pay an amount of over EUR 1.5 million. The agglomeration of the Strasbourg Court with repetitive cases having as its object the violation of Article 3 from the point of view of detention conditions and having the defendant the Romanian State led to the issuing of a pilot decision aimed at applying the appropriate general measures capable of solving the problem of overcrowding and inadequate detention conditions

Keywords: penitentiary system; ECHR; article 3; Pilot Judgment. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lum:rev11d:v::y:2017:i:20:p:65-68

DOI: 10.18662/upalaw/04

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Anuarul Universitatii „Petre Andrei” din Iasi / Year-Book „Petre Andrei” University from Iasi, Fascicula: Drept, Stiinte Economice, Stiinte Politice / Fascicle: Law, Economic Sciences, Political Sciences from Editura Lumen, Department of Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Antonio Sandu ().