Thinking Style and Moral Values in Adolescence

Claudia Sãlceanu ()
Additional contact information
Claudia Sãlceanu: Lecturer Phd, Ovidius University of Constanþa, România.

Logos Universalitate Mentalitate Educatie Noutate - Sectiunea Stiinte Sociale/ Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty - Section: Social Sciences, 2014, vol. 1, 140-148

Abstract: Moral values, as universally accepted ethical principles, that govern everyday life, maintaining unity and harmony between people and thinking styles, as positive habits that contribute to better critical thinking, problem-solving and decision-making, are two important aspects for the development of adolescents. The objectives we set out are: 1) to offer an overview on adolescents perception of moral values; 2) to discover the existence of significant differences between male and female adolescents regarding their moral values systems and 3) to distinguish the differences between the adolescent's classification of moral values due to the predominance of a certain thinking style. Using the Rokeach Value Survey (1973) and Thinking Styles Inventory by Sternberg & Wagner (1992), we questioned 127 participants, between 14 and 23 years of age. We discovered that today's adolescents value health, freedom or self-esteem (terminal values) and ambition, love or capability (instrumental values), but we found no significant differences between male and female adolescents regarding their terminal values classifications. However, there are significant differences between them regarding instrumental values. While female adolescents value independence, love and honesty, male adolescents value ambition, cleanliness and helpfulness. Using Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test for independent samples, we found significant differences between value classification based on the thinking styles. Based on Sternberg's theory of mental self-governing, we found significant differences between legislative, executive and judicial thinking people regarding terminal value “an exciting life” and instrumental value “ambitious”. While we discovered no difference between hierarchical, monarchical and oligarchical thinking people for terminal values, they value differently “independent” and “polite” (instrumental values). Although global thinking people value true friendship less than local thinking people, we found no significant differences for instrumental values. External thinking people value courage more than internal thinking people and liberal thinking people value wisdom less than conservative thinking people.

Keywords: Thinking style; Moral values; Adolescence (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A23 Y80 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://edituralumen.ro (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lum:rev17s:v:1:y:2014:i::p:140-148

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Logos Universalitate Mentalitate Educatie Noutate - Sectiunea Stiinte Sociale/ Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty - Section: Social Sciences from Editura Lumen, Department of Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Antonio Sandu ().